Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for May 01, 2020

  1. Missing large
    eastern.woods.metal  about 4 years ago

    And the people in the pews are snoring

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Martin I  about 4 years ago

    They deserve each other

     •  Reply
  3. Badger 4 360
    sirbadger  about 4 years ago

    If you are in the audience, you should sleep through this part and then drink coffee so you’ll be awake for the dance. Maybe the groom is hoping that the bride sleeps through a certain part of what’s she’s agreeing to.

     •  Reply
  4. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 4 years ago

    300 page “briefs”.

     •  Reply
  5. Step 1
    mr_sherman Premium Member about 4 years ago

    If they’re both lawyers, they can haggle it out in Divorce court.

     •  Reply
  6. Figaro 1
    Wilde Bill  about 4 years ago

    Considering that wedding vows constitute a legal contract, maybe you should have a lawyer look them over for you.

     •  Reply
  7. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  about 4 years ago

    I’m kind of fond of the idea of a law requiring wedding vows to be short enough that even nervous gigglers can get through them in less than a couple of minutes, tops.

     •  Reply
  8. Trollspry
    Enter.Name.Here  about 4 years ago

    Old joke theme.

     •  Reply
  9. New icon
    michaeljwolff  about 4 years ago

    I could say that the bride was getting married on a pro bono basis, but Sonny’s been dead for years now.

    Then again, the groom might be in a mood to Cher.

     •  Reply
  10. Img 1351
    Zykoic  about 4 years ago

    A ten year lease these days……

     •  Reply
  11. Out little avatar
    dadoctah  about 4 years ago

    It could be argued that lawyers shouldn’t be allowed to get married….

     •  Reply
  12. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  about 4 years ago

    My choice would be a seat by the exit sign – the best kind of loophole

     •  Reply
  13. Profile 6
    dot-the-I  about 4 years ago

    Potential suit – exit signs are to be above eye level.

     •  Reply
  14. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  about 4 years ago

    Well, when you consider that for centuries marriage was seen as a sort of contract between two families, I guess that’s right.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    Plainsman4 Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Did anybody notice the prominent EXIT sign in the back of the church? One last warning.

     •  Reply
  16. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Nah. Serves them right.

     •  Reply
  17. Morning cuppa
    Wizard of Ahz-no relation  about 4 years ago

    another re-run.

     •  Reply
  18. Wallpapers jonny quest 1024x768
    J Quest  about 4 years ago

    You may now kiss the party of the first part…

     •  Reply
  19. Fasseddie
    FassEddie  about 4 years ago

    The Coen Brothers did this already. George Clooney was pretty good in it.

     •  Reply
  20. Image000000
    MIHorn Premium Member about 4 years ago

    I played for a wedding between two lawyers many years ago; it was at least her third marriage and his fourth. People in the back were taking bets on how long it would last. Several years later, I was in an accident and called the law firm headed by the groom at the aforementioned wedding. The associate asked me how I’d heard of “Bruce”, and I said "I played for his and “Theresa’s” wedding". The associated said “Oh, don’t mention that — he divorced her and he’s back with his first wife.”

     •  Reply
  21. Kea
    KEA  about 4 years ago

    I’ve thought for a long time that Marriages and Weddings should be treated entirely separately. The former is a legal contract and the latter is a religious rite turned into a public spectacle.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Znox11  about 4 years ago

    Marriage vows and NFL contracts have a lot in common.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    thelordthygod666  about 4 years ago

    My grandson was considering being a lawyer. I told him to become a pimp instead because it would be a more positive contribution to society and his colleagues would have higher ethical standards.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    jbruins84341  about 4 years ago

    Why lawyers should never reproduce.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    the lost wizard  about 4 years ago

    Will the party of the first part please stop referring to the party of the second part as that piece I’m going to get tonight.

     •  Reply
  26. George jetson
    Bicycle Dude  about 4 years ago

    I like the exit sign, which of course, I’d be heading, right, about, now…

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur